Monday 30 July 2007

3 problems with multiparty loyalty programmes

The future may well belong to networks. But multi-party loyalty programmes need to solve three problems before they get there.


First, and the most obvious one, is the technology hurdle. How will these programmes ensure that the software that runs the unified loyalty programme smoothly links with the separate transactional, sales and marketing software and CRM databases (I assume that all participating companies will not equate ‘giving points’ with ‘taking care of customers.’)


Second, sooner or later, the programme will need to play the role similar to a points market. This will entail ensuring that points accounts (members’ and marketers’) are properly settled and points-to-purchase ratios are commonly acceptable. For example, the trade in points (which are, to all intents and purposes, deferred discounts) is bound to lead to deficits and surpluses, and problems within individual companies.


Even if these two are solved by importing experts from other fields, there remains a third problem: A multiparty loyalty programme lessens choice, for both customers and marketers.


Let’s take customers first.


With single-party loyalty programmes, as a customer, I will not be penalised for buying petrol from my favourite brand and staying at my favoured hotel: I get points on both counts.


On the other hand, if petrol companies and hotel chains tie up, I lose if my favoured hotelier is not my petrol brand’s (loyalty) partner.


I may, though, reason that I’ll reach the loyalty rewards faster by pooling points from different sources; decide that the hotelier’s petrol partner is not so bad after all; and switch.


(For sure, the number of rewards redeemed will go up [as compared to stand-alone programmes], but this shouldn’t hurt marketers very much if they pool their rewards budgets. Unfortunately, we don’t know how much the redemption rates and amounts will increase.)


It may be argued that since consumers usually buy from a number of brands, there is no conflict of interest between consumers’ need for choice and multiparty programmes rewarding only purchases within a set of brands.


I suppose the matter is somewhat more complicated in real life. While customers may well buy from a number of brands, in frequently bought categories like groceries, credit cards, air travel, and telecommunications the basket is not equally split: A particular (favoured) brand takes the lion’s share. And it is inconceivable that any multiparty programme should have all or most of any member’s favoured brands.


Rationally, that may not be horrible. The consumer just needs to enrol in multiple (multiparty?) programmes and get his fill of points from multiple sources. Now, if only consumers were that rational.


Let’s take the marketer’s point of view. Suppose he wanted to run a sales promotion. As long as he didn’t tie up with other brands, the whole paying population was his market.


Once he gets into partnerships, he limits his choice, at any rate, his first choice, to his partners. There is perhaps little to suggest that his partners’ customers will be his best prospects. (It’s like some direct mail companies agreeing to exchange lists exclusively - an arrangement that is extremely unlikely to benefit any.)


There will certainly be some overlap, but what else can one expect with promiscuous consumers and markets dominated by a few major brands. (The drivers of any multiparty loyalty programme will have to major brands, though many small ones, and even single outlets, may join it… with limited rights, and even more limited powers… primarily to rent loyalty infrastructure and services.)


I don’t think there is any empirical evidence that shows this fear to be misplaced. There are, of course, quite a few multiparty loyalty programmes. There was, of course, the USSR.

6 comments:

mb said...

Having been a marketer for quite some time now, I have realised that multiple party programmes only sound good since they are tieing up a whole bunch of merchants,retailers,malls, etc but the merchant's point of view is that none of the brands individually make it to the top. Since the approach is so wide and large that untill the programme is as large as, say iMint, the brands will not get any mileage at all without individual advertising or marketing of their own - relating them to the Loyalty programme.

N&P said...

Dear MB, I suppose we agree here. I'd be grateful to know about papers, articles and books on multi-party programmes. PAC

oakleyses said...

longchamp outlet, cheap oakley sunglasses, chanel handbags, oakley sunglasses, replica watches, christian louboutin outlet, louis vuitton, jordan shoes, nike air max, louboutin pas cher, longchamp pas cher, burberry pas cher, prada outlet, gucci handbags, christian louboutin shoes, polo outlet, replica watches, nike free run, tiffany jewelry, louis vuitton outlet, christian louboutin uk, prada handbags, nike free, oakley sunglasses, ray ban sunglasses, christian louboutin, louis vuitton, jordan pas cher, ugg boots, ray ban sunglasses, michael kors pas cher, longchamp outlet, air max, polo ralph lauren outlet online, oakley sunglasses, sac longchamp pas cher, nike air max, nike outlet, tory burch outlet, oakley sunglasses wholesale, kate spade outlet, uggs on sale, louis vuitton outlet, louis vuitton outlet, ray ban sunglasses, longchamp outlet, nike roshe, polo ralph lauren, tiffany and co

oakleyses said...

michael kors outlet online, ray ban uk, michael kors outlet online, kate spade, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet, polo lacoste, nike air max, nike free uk, hogan outlet, nike air max uk, true religion outlet, guess pas cher, michael kors outlet online, nike roshe run uk, oakley pas cher, uggs outlet, hollister pas cher, vans pas cher, abercrombie and fitch uk, hollister uk, nike tn, true religion jeans, sac vanessa bruno, true religion outlet, true religion outlet, converse pas cher, nike blazer pas cher, mulberry uk, burberry outlet, lululemon canada, nike air max uk, sac hermes, michael kors, ray ban pas cher, north face uk, michael kors outlet online, ralph lauren uk, nike air force, north face, coach outlet store online, uggs outlet, michael kors, new balance, replica handbags, timberland pas cher, coach outlet, burberry handbags, coach purses

oakleyses said...

hollister clothing, converse outlet, vans, chi flat iron, timberland boots, north face outlet, mont blanc pens, abercrombie and fitch, ray ban, nike air max, p90x workout, hollister, nike huaraches, beats by dre, lululemon, asics running shoes, nike trainers uk, babyliss, wedding dresses, vans outlet, gucci, mcm handbags, mac cosmetics, herve leger, lancel, oakley, reebok outlet, nike air max, insanity workout, iphone cases, converse, bottega veneta, longchamp uk, instyler, new balance shoes, nfl jerseys, north face outlet, celine handbags, louboutin, jimmy choo outlet, valentino shoes, soccer jerseys, ferragamo shoes, ghd hair, hermes belt, ralph lauren, hollister, soccer shoes, nike roshe run, baseball bats

oakleyses said...

hollister, wedding dresses, louis vuitton, moncler uk, moncler, supra shoes, canada goose outlet, canada goose outlet, thomas sabo, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, canada goose, moncler, louis vuitton, ugg, juicy couture outlet, ugg pas cher, montre pas cher, swarovski, moncler, moncler, karen millen uk, louis vuitton, canada goose uk, doudoune moncler, links of london, canada goose, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, louis vuitton, marc jacobs, moncler outlet, swarovski crystal, pandora jewelry, coach outlet, canada goose outlet, canada goose jackets, replica watches, juicy couture outlet, ugg uk, louis vuitton, canada goose, pandora uk, toms shoes, pandora charms, moncler outlet, pandora jewelry